ENp.2
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
9 revisions | EricRoscoe at Jul 12, 2022 01:27 AM | |
|---|---|---|
p.2I cannot believe that this map belongs either to the Clinton Group or Blue Limestone, no II. Specimens no 22 B. & 44 these have very much the aspect of some portions of the [gray?] Limestone of our [Ouaudaya?] Salt group- but the specimens are too few and not sufficient characteristic to decide. Similar drab layers also belong on a lower formation - 44 is [acc?]annulated or [illegible] no III. Specimens indicate the Niagara Limestone no 1 Favorite [alveolaie?]? 2 | p.2I cannot believe that this map belongs either to the Clinton Group or Blue Limestone, no II. Specimens no 22 B. & 44 these have very much the aspect of some portions of the [gray?] Limestone of our [Ouaudaya?] Salt group- but the specimens are too few and not sufficient characteristic to decide. Similar drab layers also belong on a lower formation - 44 is [acc?]annulated or [illegible] no III. Specimens indicate the Niagara Limestone no 1 Favorite [alveolaie?]? 2 [list of hand written specimens starting on line 10...to |
Wisconsin Historical Society Transcription Projects
Help us transcribe historical documents from the Wisconsin Historical Society Archives
Questions or comments? Contact Us
