Untitled Page 5

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Complete

The brain was removed from ill mice and used for further passages in
the form of a 10% brain suspension.

Isolated agents were investigated in 3-4 passages. CF antigens to the
studied viruses were made by the sucrose-acetone method (Clarke and Casals
1958). Standard hyperimmune rat and rabbit sera and immune ascitic fluids
(LAF) to polygroup A, B, and TBE encephalitis viruses were used as specific
serum (Gaidamovich et al. 1969).

RESULTS

A total of 2,010 birds of 53 Species was serologically examined. We
trapped 275 birds in the spring, 1,630 in summer, and 105 in fall.

Ninety-three bird brain samples and parenchymal organs of 339 birds
of 22 species were virologically examined.

Of 2,010 bird blood samples, 56 contained CF antibodies to TBE virus
(titers 1:8, 1:64, and higher), i.e. 2.7 ±0.1%.

The maximum level of immunological responses was recorded in forest
birds, such as sparrow and woodcock.

Table 1 show results from virological investigations of bird organs.

Isolated strains were apathogenic for guinea pigs and rabbits and their
titers in tests on white mice were: 5.0 by intracerebral, 4.6 by intranasal,
3.8 by intravenous, and 1.8 lg LD50/0.02 ml by intraperitoneal inoculations
of strain 54, and 6.5 by intracerebral, 5.3 by intravenous, 3.2 by intranasal,
and 2.0 lg LD50/0.02 mi by intraperitoneal inoculation of strain 59.

The subcutaneous inoculation method was unsuccessful. The incubation
period of infected mice fluctuated between 4 and 5 days. Experimental
infection was characterized by disorders in coordination of movements and
death of animals.

Chicken embryos (9-10 days old) proved also to be sensible to the
viruses isolated. Strains 54 and 59 reproduced in the allantoic cavity and their
titers were 2.5-4.0 lg. The highest mortality rate of embryos inoculated
with a dose of 10 LD50 was observed on day 3-5 following infection.

For identification of strains. we used the CF test with standard hyperimmune
sera (Table 2).

-2-

T730

Notes and Questions

Please sign in to write a note for this page

Jbarber

Not sure how to fix the subscripts from my device or if it's necessary to?

Nathani

I indicated that it was a subscript but I don't think it was really necessary and I largely did it out of habit. My career was in biology and my not so humble opinion is that any professional reading the text should immediately recognize the meaning without the note.

Jbarber

No worries! This is my first time reviewing, so I wasn't sure what the protocol for subscript was. I saw you indicated it of course, but was more curious if that was because of the formatting in general or just a personal choice. Thanks for clarifying!

Nathani

I've been transcribing for nearly 10 years and have become accustomed to making such notes. In another project, there is a suggestion that insertions with a caret be so marked. This doesn't make my practice correct. My experience with toxicity data was limited but if I were to see "LD50", I would know immediately what was meant.
On another matter , there are several concentrations given in the manner "0.5 lg" and I have no idea what is meant nor did a quick search tell me anything.

USDA National Agricultural Library

A little late on this, but am reviewing some pages today. We decided that subscripts should be transcribed as is. I updated the basic help page which includes subscript and chemical formula guidelines as well as other transcription guidelines.