90

118

The aggregate of those collections would falsify my
proposition that the collection of collections of the
Ms is greater than the Ms. It would not be so
for such an aggregate. But that has been
proved to be necessarily true for all collections.
Then such an aggregate would not be a
collection. It would be too many to be a collection.
How so? I haven't time to show you; but I will
tell you. It is because you have then so crowded
the field of possibility, that the units of that
aggregate lose their individual identity. It ceases
to be a collection because it is now a continuum.

I regret exceedingly that I cannot give
you a lecture on continuity because
my discoveries in that field are of

118

The aggregate of those collections would falsify my
proposition that the collection of collections of the
Ms is greater than the Ms. It would not be so
for such an aggregate. But that has been
proved to be necessarily true for all collections.
Then such an aggregate would not be a
collection. It would be too many to be a collection.
How so? I haven't time to show you; but I will
tell you. It is because you have then so crowded
the field of possibility, that the units of that
aggregate Jose their individual identity. It ceases
to be a collection because it is now a continuum.

I regret exceedingly that I cannot give
you a lecture on continuity because
my discoveries in that field are of