63

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions
dougreade at Mar 05, 2019 02:44 AM

63

(1 enclosure)

Office of the Light House Engineer
Thirteenth District
Portland, Oregon August 26, 1871

Rear Admiral W.B. Shubrick

Chairman Light House Board
Washington, D.C.

Sir:

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the communication from your office dated Aug. 12th in reference to the site of the Cape Foulweather Light House.

When I visited Cape Foulweather April 24th I was undecided as to recommending the "Point" or a site on the side of the hill sufficiently high to require only a very low tower. By going east from 200 to 300 yards the site would be on the side hill at a height of from 100 feet to 150 feet; while at the point it is only 70 feet high.

On my return to San Francisco I discussed the question with Col. Williamson and he said by all means take the extreme point and build a high tower. He had twice examined the location and carefully studied the matter and his opinion decided mine against economizing in the cost of the tower at a sacrifice of say

306

63

Office of the Light House Engineer
Thirteenth District
Portland, Oregon August 26, 1871

Rear Admiral W.B. Shubrick

Chairman Light House Board
Washington, D.C.

Sir:

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the communication from your office dated Aug. 12th in reference to the site of the Cape Foulweather Light House.

When I visited Cape Foulweather April 24th I was undecided as to recommending the "Point" or a site on the side of the hill sufficiently high to require only a very low tower. By going east from 200 to 300 yards the site would be on the side hill at a height of from 100 feet to 150 feet; while at the point it is only 70 feet high.

On my return to San Francisco I discussed the question with Col. Williamson and he said by all means take the extreme point and build a high tower. He had twice examined the location and carefully studied the matter and his opinion decided mine against economizing in the cost of the tower at a sacrifice of say