Slips of paper containing names and in some instances notes about cases. 1807-1820

149 to 153. Origs

John & James Hughes} ------------- vs -------------} ---- Conrad Shafer -----} Motion for a new trial

1. Because the verdict was against Evidence -- 2. Because the verdict was founded in mistake -- 3. Because the Jury [ ] found the verdict for interest on a note which had before been found by a verdict to be wholly paid --

R. B. Taney

251. Cts Jno. Reasons new trial

filed 20.^th february 1808

Frederick Bachmann} ------------ vs --------------} Debt £60 -Abraham Banckerd -}

M^r. Ritchie Issue as above R. B. Taney

Jany 14^th 1811

283. FC.11.