3

You may have, as in do, another [State?] [shall?],
abolishing, or seeking to abolish. this rule in Shelley's
Case. If so, James takes I apprehend, an estate
for life, with remainder in fee, to the heirs-male
of his body, remainder, upon a [doable?] contingency,
to [Willim?] for life or in fee, [according?]
as you have or have not dispensed with [body?]
of inheritance in order to create an est. in fee;
{(2 [Min.] [?]} with the {p?} possible consequence that
upon the [?] of James' [for?], the [f?] remainder
become [vested?], I [?] was defeated. (2
[Min.?] [?] 397). I rather think however, that the
remainder to James' male heirs remained in
contingency [with?] his death, and as he died
without [male?] heirs, that [William's?] alternate
remainder took effect.

Having [repand?] to one [?] [S?] (2
[Min.] [?], 392 to 394), I am of opinion that [?],
that devise in questions would [?] in James,
an estate in fee simple, reduced by implication,
without the aid of the rule is Shelley's Case, to an
estate in fee-Fail, which by [own?] Stat. of 1776, [wd?]
be [c?] into a fee-simple. And that [William?]

You may have, as in do, another [State?] [shall?],
abolishing, or seeking to abolish. this rule in Shelley's
Case. If so, James takes I apprehend, an estate
for life, with remainder in fee, to the heirs-male
of his body, remainder, upon a [doable?] contingency,
to [Willim?] for life or in fee, [according?]
as you have or have not dispensed with [body?]
of inheritance in order to create an est. in fee;
{(2 [Min.] [?]} with the {p?} possible consequence that
upon the [?] of James' [for?], the [f?] remainder
become [vested?], I [?] was defeated. (2
[Min.?] [?] 397). I rather think however, that the
remainder to James' male heirs remained in
contingency [with?] his death, and as he died
without [male?] heirs, that [William's?] alternate
remainder took effect.

Having [?] to one [?] [S?] (2
[Min.] [?], 392 to 394), I am of opinion that [?],
that devise in questions would [?] in James,
an estate in fee simple, reduced by implication,
without the aid of the rule is Shelley's Case, to an
estate in fee-Fail, which by [own?] Stat. of 1776, [wd?]
be [c?] into a fee-simple. And that [William?]