2

dett v Clay 8 [Billonr.?] 287 [9 U.I. Dig. 338, Mortgages. 152]; Dick
v Mawry 9 [Sm. I Maisk?] (Mi) 448 [8 U.I. Dig. 281. Mortgages 192];
Servis v [Starke?] 10 [Sm Tm. 120?] [Uid. 193]; Henderson v Her-
Regney v Lovejoy 13 W.H. 247 [7 U.i. Dig. 371. Mortg. 115-116]; Mile v [Gray?] Monr. 417 [ 5 U.I. Dig. 42]
rod 10 [SM Tm. 631?] [Uid. 196];
Mortge. 261]; Fitzsimmon appeal 4 Barr. 248; ^ Crosby v Brownson 2 Day (Con) Fox v Foster [Do 119 [7 US Dig 50 Assign. 32-3]?];
425, [2 US. Dig. 344, Mortgage, 1149]; Johnson v Hart 3 John. 322,?
Laurence v Knapp 1 [Roof?] (Cont) 248; Terry v Wood 6 [Sm tm?]
1399 Blair v Bass 4 Blackf. 539; [Ineer?] v Hart 1 Johns. 580, [2 U.S.
345, Mortgage, 1153]; Patterson v Hull 9 [Corv.?] 747, [2 U.S. Dig. 345,
Mortgs. 1158]; Stevenson v Blank, Santess (N Jersey) 338, [Id 346,
Morts. 1184]; Betz v Heebner 1 Penn. 280 [Uid 1189]; Eman-
ned v Hunt 2 Ala. 190 [ Id 347, Mort. 1194]; Laberge v Chau-
vin 2 Mis. 179 [ Uid. 1209];

In Vermont & Maine, especially in the latter, their
doctrine has not met with perfect acceptance, appa-
rently on the ground, vainly urged in Dryden v Frost,
& Mybre + Craig 678, namely that a mortgage of land is
an interest in real property, which cannot be assigned
by parol. In that case the chancellor ([Lo Lottenham?]) got
over the objection by the analogy of the vendor's lieu, - equivi-
table mortgages by deposit of title deeds [t. h 673?]. Here in
Vermont it has been held that if all the notes secured
by a mortgage are assigned, the mortgage passes with them,
but if partially assigned, whether the whole mortgage,
or a proportionate part, or any interect therein is assign-
ed, depends on the actual agreement of the parties.
Landgon v Keith 9 Vermt 299. [2 U.S. Dig. 344, Mntg. 1145].
And in Maine it has been repeatedly decided that the
transfer of the note does ^ not itself operate a legal transfer
^(ie a transfer organizable in a court of law) of the mortgage whereby it is secured. Dwinel v Perly, 32
Maine (2 Redington) 197), [12 U.S. Dig. 441, Mntg. 158]; Waner
v Homestead 33 Maine (3 Red.) 197, [13 U.S. Dig. 496, Mntg.
235]; Smith v Keller 27 Maine (14 Shepley) 237, [9 U.S. Dig. 338.
Mntg. 143.]