Answer to Fulmore Question on Statute of Limitations, undated

ReadAboutContentsHelp

Pages

Page 1
Complete

Page 1

Office of Fulmore, Wallace, & Wooldridge, Attorneys at Law and Land Agents Austin, Texas 187 Statutes of limitations of our states read. All actions for injuries be the reasons shall be commenced and freed an within one year next after the cause of action of each suit and not after

We represent pltiff. in a damafe suit. the accident causing occured in the 26th Match 1871 - We brought suit of the 25th March 1872 - Are we barred?

Fulmore Wooldrige

Last edit over 6 years ago by ara8va
Page 2
Needs Review

Page 2

Sec 1 Rob. Pr. [2 (?)]. 416th; 1 (?) Gen, Pr. 775: 2 (?) 148;

In the Consideration of time for Stat. (?) the day on which the cause of action [asumed?] is to be included, as an action might have been commenced that day. (?) Williams, 15 Mar. 193; (Bac?) (Alv?)(Liion?) of [?] [D], p 376

When (Compn?) of time is to be made from an but done, the day on (?) out is done is to be included. Bac, Abr. (?) [Q] p 804.

There was a review of the previous cases by Sir W Grant in [?] v [?] 18 Ves, 255 etc. and the conclusion was that there was no general, that is "invariable" rule of compenstation but that the first day was (?) in either exclusion or inclusion, as the justice reason the case might require; but says that 'great pledge' "I rather think it wd be more easy to maintain on testimonial reasoning, that the day of an act done, or an event happening, ought in all cases to be [?}] than that it shd in all cases be included". In that case the day was [?] and the M.R. appeared to think, whilst he disdained any attempt to establish a general rule that the day from which the computation is made is always to be excluded, unless to include it is (useful?) to give effect to the intention.

In [?] [?] [?] 5T.R. 283 it was held in ( [?] mity with Thomas v Popham, 2 [?] 218 & 2 Inst. 674) that when a State. reqd a deed to be enrolled within 20 days of its execution the day of its ex'on must be [excluded?], and [?] Kenyon sd "Suppose the direction of the act had been to enrol the memorial within one day, cd it be pretended that this meant the same thing as if is were sd that is shd be done on the same day on the act was done? If not, neither can it be continued exclusively, when a greater no. of days is allowed".

This cased indeed (?) o Fox Hall 1 Ball, 193, and (?) (?) 12 House [40 E.C.H.] 635 and in (?) Pellow (?) (?) a (?) 134, (?)

Last edit about 1 year ago by MaryV
Displaying all 2 pages