81

Overview Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions	UVA Law Library at Oct 07, 2022 06:07 PM	Compared with
Oct 07, 2022 UVA Law Library Oct 06, 2022 laureneoneil Oct 02, 2022 asr5dd Sep 07, 2022 UVA Law Library	81 WAS THERE ANY "ACCIDENT'? INTENTIONAL Ins. ACTION (59) Jernigan v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1959) STANDPOINT OF INJURED PARTY * ONLY (v. last case) (* not comp ins. situation) Omnibus clause driver int. drove over Π. Now Π's rep. suing IR. Held: Viewed from standpoint of the injured party, the fatal injury was the result of an accident.	81 WAS THERE ANY "ACCIDENT'? INTENTIONAL Ins. ACTION (59) Femigom v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1959) STANDPOINT OF INJURED PARTY * ONLY (v. last case) (* not Omnibus clause driver int. drove over comp ins. Π. Now Π's rep. suing IR. situation) Held: Viewed from standpoint of the injured party, the fatal injury was the result of an accident.

81

4 revisions

81

81