[Notebook, United Nations, 1958]

Engagements Oct 7 - 23 Washington 24 Phila.

Nov 2. Chairman Boland Thurs 25th Meeting 4th Com-room 3 at U.N. Bldg. Topic elec vice chairman - Norway for Mr Rodzining shy of Poland Roumania " - elected speech by Mr Rodzinsky on ground of better [workup?] results for meetings ceylon - withdrew his name as [rap portear?] Costa Rica elect Alan of Israel Austia 2nd's Alans [nomenahon?] Liberia + statement Mr Elan elected Speech " "

2 Organizing work a- Greece suggests item 1-3-2 b Ghana for 1. + a.b.c together then d. c U.K. d. Liberia e France suggests take Item 1 then plan others Ghana 2nd's Liberia will wish tem 2 - next Paraguay - clarify. Items adopted as are

South West Aftrica 1 - United Arab Republic accepts Ghana suggestion to take a-b.c. jointly 2 Sweden wishes a b.c. separately 3 Brazil " a detached 4 Mexico " 1 single item + 5 Liberia " opportunely discuss 3 together 6 Jordan - wishes whole subject 7 South Africa " a separately admits no progress madewidening breach and mad [made] it more difficult. 57 more conciliatory attitude. letters to paper print no word. Items separately reparate does not agree separate " " " Sweden idea all interwoven disagree with Sweden agree with Ghana " also Mexico

8 New Zeland - " 9 Peru 10 Ceylon quite long speech

Uruguay -

Israel - preposed adjouned but not quite

Uruguay - point of order asking Israel to withold its wants others to have right to speak

Japan - wishes right to go into other "aspects" if necessary

Jugoslavia - against separatiing wishes during discussions delegates spirit of moder ation - concern etc.

Uruguay - Sweden and Brazil wishes separ wants clarification of separating. should be able to discuss all 4 parts.

Sept 26th 1143 1 must also consider #2

resumption proceedural debate

1 - rep. S. Africa - rigid #I or a 2 - " Ethiopia suggestiion change in order 3 - U.S.A. suggests = start with GO report 4 - Indonesia - suggest all items in #1 at 1 time 5 U.K. - " G.O.C. a.b.c consecutively 6 Iran - does not agree gen'l debate then each item 7 Cuba - suggest GO.C. report 8 Iraq - agrees mexico and wants to know if SA agrees with Mexico 9 India - against G.O.C. report which would lead us in a diverse direction " " a isolation 10 Ethiopia - propose - furt withdrawl b - but with 11 Yemen - sees dificulty in keeping separate the items 12 USSR. - must be considered as single question how can one accept G.O.C. without charter etc agrees with Ghana etc 13 Dominican Repub - conciliatory attitude taken yesterday may be quite good. belive only restrictions should be provision in charter. would support report good offices comm

14 - Haiti - believes all papers in all languages should be studied then debate

15 Philippines against separate sub items unless not water tight, also points of order to be allowed.

16 Chairman's summary

Item 1 as a whole S 2 1st gen'l debate 3 Mexican suggestion 4 b-c-a Ghana sug 6 4 sub items to be dealt with separately

17 Ceylon - what does separate mean as used by Sweden

18 Venezuela yeilds to Sweden Separate not meant watertight

19 - Venezuela - against separation for Mexico's idea chair could allow discussion into other area -

20 Mexico embillicably linked they are as (fingers of 1 hand) right of debate then G.O.C

21 = against rigidty

22 Ethiopia - does he understand a geneal debate first then discussion of each item.

23 Uruguay - Not to change map nor - colonialism but for no restrictions on delegates when they talk.

proposals

1 - in consecutive order Item 1 with understanding speaker may make statement re otehr sub items. 24 S.A. takes exception to Ghana's [Ethiopia crossed out] suggestion 25 Jugoslavai - for gen'l debate first 26 Haiti has same views a searlier and wishes clarifying 27 Ghana - wants all papers 28 Uruguay - Mexico's statement need clarifying (the end of it) General debate a usual procedure 29 U.S. agrees with Chairmans outline