180803220708

Agreement made the third day of May 1859. Belurum Christian. Brunhs of the city of New York of the first hart and Thomas 43 day of the dance of the deemed, hart, whoever the harty of the first hart is the owner of a loft now situated on the North side of Grand Street beginging at a joint distant 18 feet 10 inches from the East side of Thompson Street and Hemming parrallel With Thompson Street 11.4 feet, .... Easterly on a line with Grand Street .... wide and whereas the .... of the .... past is the owner of a lot off Grand on the Westerly side of said line and whereas the... of the second hart is the owner of the first ... about exsisting a dwelling (scribbles) on the load drained lot extraordinary from grand street 42 1/2 feet now it is hereby mutually agreed by and between the parties here to that the party of the first feast shall and.... and builing a harty wall of suitable thickness of one half inch width upon each of the above maintained lots. The ... to commmence 10 feet below the committee governed will admit of gazing that depth?. butbe not less than 8 feet below the curb and to extend in length 42 1/2 feet and in height - 60 feet.The house to become remains a harty wall between the dwelling house about to be... by the harty of the 1st hart and any dwelling that may be elevated when the lot of the hand harty of the second hart. and weitten to maintained.

.... in said wall required sufficiently for a new building fter to build in the beams to above the 4th tier of beam of party thall make any cuttings or indentings therein to agratin depth than 1/2 of dried wall and either party shall have the right and priviledge at any time to extend dried wall in depth or in ... meaning that the said wall can be built on the same line to the full depth of the lots of either party and the party of the deemed past agrees for himself or his hear and a signs that whatever he or they use said wall as he or they shall use and in case the parties cannot agree upon each value the dance shall be submitted to the .... of the building one to be chosen by each of the said parties or either legal before the decision of any ... to the final between the parties. In witness where of the parties to have set their hand and reals the day and year final above mentioned. Christian Brauns... Bray bealed and dilowned in presence of Witing S Charles W Levitt Jolin Frenche and its is further especially agreed by and between the qualiteies that neither party shall go to any greater depth than the said wall when building in recieving all damages and loss to the party of the 1st part Christian Bruans Thomas Bray witnessed .... Jewilt John French city and county of New York on this 2nd day of May A.D. 1861 before me personally appease?. Edward W Jewell a ....within to the foregoing movement and addition there to me known who being for the city of New York that he was acquainted with Christian Bruans and Thomas Bray and knew them to be the incl....? to described in and who executed said adjustment and act dilion execute the fame and the he the said charles W Jewel thereafter described his name as a witness

First whom weitten Michael Joyer. Sealed and delivered in the prescense of J waslsey Shepard State of New York, City of New York, County of New York on the fifth day of July in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighty nine before me. Sonally came Michael Joyce to me known and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the same Woosely Shepard, notary public Ringo county (certified in New York County). Recorded preceding at request of J Woosely Shepard July Tenth 1889 at 10 O'clock and 33 minutes A.M. Witness my Hand James J. Slevin, Register

This Indenture, made this Birthday of July in the year of Eighteen hundred and eighty nine. Between many Elders of the city, county and the state of New York party of the first and Catherine Dermot of the same place and party of the deemed pair: whereas Christian Brauns entered into a party wall agreement with Thomas Bray witness with lay a certain indenture in writing dated May 3rd 1859 and recorded May 2nd 1861 in the registered office of the city and county of New York in 838 of conveyance page 390. and by which agreement it appears that Chrisitian Bruans was the owner at that time of a certain lots of ground situated on the fourth side of Grand Street, Beginning at a point distant eighteen feet ten inches from the east side of Thompson street and running parallel with Thompson Street Forty seven feet, Easterly on a line with Grand street eighteen feet ten inches wide; and that ThomasBray was the owner of a lot of ground on the Westerly side of said line and whereas it was agreed by the parties to the said party wall agreement that the said Chrisitian Bruans should greet and build a party wall one and half inch width upon each of the above partitioned lots and that the same should be a party wall between the dwelling then about to be erected by the said Christian Bruans on his lot and any dwelling house that might afterward be erected by the said Thomas Bray on his lot: and that neither of the said parties should make any cuttings or insecting there in to a greater depth than one half of said wall: and that the said Thomas Bray and his ... and a signs when he or they should move said wallshould pay the value of .. much of the halfof said wall as he or they should use, and that in case the parties could not agree upon such value the same should be submitted to the decision of three builders one to the chosen by each of said parties and the two so chosen

by to chose the third and the decision of anytwo to be final and whereas the said many elders the party of the first part in now the owner of the parmizol owned by the Christian Bruans at the time the said part wall agreement was entered into. And whereas the said bathe time into Dermott the part of the deemed part the owner of the view was owned by Thomas Bray at the time the said party wall agreement was entered into. And whereas the said Catherine Dermott the party of the deemed past has made cuttings and unitings in said party wall to greater depth than one half of said wall and is now covering and desires to use said party wall and to be forever released from any claim or obligation whatever by reaim of such present or suitable to agree on the value of so much of the half of said wall and issuance ofthe party wall agreement have submitted to the decision of the builders are chosen by each of the parties here to and the third chosen by the said two the question of value. And where as majority of said three builders have found such value. And whereas a majority of said three builders have found such value to the six hundred and seventy eight dollars and fifty cents. How this indenture witnesed that the said party of the first wall part in resurance of said party wall agreement and in certain action of the sum of six hundred and seventy eight dollars and fifty cents to the duly paid at the time of the .... and the granted wall and wuit claim and to set over cents to the said party fo the second past. All that equal undivided half interest in aid to the said party wall together with the here ditaments?? and after tenants there to belonging including the right title and all clues now in said party wall : and all the right title and interest of the said party of thefirst part of in and to the equal to the interest that the said interest here by conveyed may be discharged. All claims against the said party of the second part the intent and assigns under and by witness of said party wall agreement, and that thte said wall shall always be and remain a party wall as provided under and by said party wall agreement foresaid. To have and to hold the interest hereby released and conveyed to the said party of the second part and assigns and their own proper use of ... and discharged of and from all and claim under and by witnessof the indentured of the party wall agreement. In witness of the use of the party of the first part has agreed to.

This page is not transcribed, please help transcribe this page