Pages
1857-12-23_NazrotoCurtis1_1831_036_012_002
Dear Sir,
I have your note of this morning [enclosing?] the letter of W. Mann. -
The chief explanation which he gives, is in regard to the granite posts, which you will remember I did not dispute. -
I thought at the time the bill was rendered for the other work, and still think, that it was extremely high, and I also thought that it was for the interest of Mount Auburn that charges should be made as low and even lower than the work could be done by outside parties.-
I know but little about it myself, but from inquiries which I made
1857-12-23_NazrotoCurtis2_1831_036_012_002
of others was satisfied in my own mind that it could have been done much cheaper.-
I requested Mr Mann to send me a memorandum of the actual cost of the work to Mt Auburn, (I asked this for my guidance as a Trustee that I might form an estimate of charges made to others), he sent me only the [?] of the charge in my bill which before he had stated in a more [?] manner - Probably he mistook my question.-
I cannot see how so much gravel and loam can have been used, nor so much labor expended and think he must have charged me with a part
of the expense of filling up the hollow, with which I had nothing to do.-
I do not know that I can say any thing more than to repeat that I think the bill a very high one - and if the precise nature and amount of the work could be ascertained I believe it would [prove?] so.-
With these remarks I have the matter with the Committee, the amount not being the object, but the principle for Mt Auburn -
[?] respectfully Yrs C.G. Nazro Dec. 23/57
W Curtis