16

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
lerivoir at Mar 16, 2017 07:24 AM

16

the gay crowd. We did that for a while, and then I moved to Albany, NY with a girlfriend. I did work for like, the New York Rocker, a lot of free publications, various music publications, Slash, I would do various articles for these magazines when I was in my late teens, early twenties. When I moved to Austin, I started writing for the Chronicle almost right away. It was nonmusical stuff first. The first big article I did was called "Musical Like Me," and it was about how I'd just moved to town and I told everybody I was a musician to get women. It was this really cheesy article. It went over really big, it was really funny. It was kind of a takeoff on the whole loser musician lifestyle and why women like these cads. I started doing a column in the Austin Chronicle in 1985 and it was called "Don't You Start Me Talkin'." It was a gossipy satire music column, but it encapsulated the whole music scene. At first, people were wanting to beat me up. A lot. I had a lot of threats, like people looking for me and this and that, for about six months I was terrified. The skinheads were looking for me because I did this article, "Why Dragworms Are Better Than Skinheads."

Is this something that you would be proud of?

Not really. When skinheads look for you it's a little different than angry letter writers. I wouldn't say that I get off on the negative attention, but I get off on the attention. I think it's good that if your business is critiquing others, I think it's really good that you go under some criticism too. As hard as I criticize bands or other people, I should be criticized too. Probably the only thing that bothers me is when people write that I'm a lousy writer. I don't mind so much when they say, "He's an idiot, he doesn't know music, he doesn't know what he's talking about," but when I get letters about how I'm just a dreadful writer, that's the only thing that bothers me, because I think that's the one saving grace, that's the reason I can get away with what I do, is that I put a lot of time and effort and energy and creativity into what I do, and so I think I'm allowed a little more room to criticize others. It was really important to me, once I reached the point where I thought I was the equal of the musicians, because when you start off it's all stacked, like they're the gods and you're the media, you're the person who stuck a microphone in front of their face, following them around and basically sniffing up around musicians, but once I got to the point where I thought, "Wait a minute, what I'm doing is as creatively viable as what they're doing," I got a lot of confidence in my opinion. I thought, "I have as much right

16

the gay crowd. We did that for a while, and then I moved to Albany, NY with a girlfriend. I did work for like, the New York Rocker, a lot of free publications, various music publications, Slash, I would do various articles for these magazines when I was in my late teens, early twenties. When I moved to Austin, I started writing for the Chronicle almost right away. It was nonmusical stuff first. The first big article I did was called "Musical Like Me," and it was about how I'd just moved to town and I told everybody I was a musician to get women. It was this really cheesy article. It went over really big, it was really funny. It was kind of a takeoff on the whole loser musician lifestyle and why women like these cads. I started doing a column in the Austin Chronicle in 1985 and it was called "Don't You Start Me Talkin'." It was a gossipy satire music column, but it encapsulated the whole music scene. At first, people were wanting to beat me up. A lot. I had a lot of threats, like people looking for me and this and that, for about six months I was terrified. The skinheads were looking for me because I did this article, "Why dragworms Are Better Than Skinheads."

Is this something that you would be proud of?

Not really. When skinheads look for you it's a little different than angry letter writers. I wouldn't say that I get off on the negative attention, but I get off on the attention. I think it's good that if your business is critiquing others, I think it's really good that you go under some criticism too. As hard as I criticize bands or other people, I should be criticized too. Probably the only thing that bothers me is when people write that I'm a lousy writer. I don't mind so much when they say, "He's an idiot, he doesn't know music, he doesn't know what he's talking about," but when I get letters about how I'm just a dreadful writer, that's the only thing that bothers me, because I think that's the one saving grace, that's the reason I can get away with what I do, is that I put a lot of time and effort and energy and creativity into what I do, and so I think I'm allowed a little more room to criticize others. It was really important to me, once I reached the point where I thought I was the equal of the musicians, because when you start off it's all stacked, like they're the gods and you're the media, you're the person who stuck a microphone in front of their face, following them around and basically sniffing up around musicians, but once I got to the point where I thought, "Wait a minute, what I'm doing is as creatively viable as what they're doing," I got a lot of confidence in my opinion. I thought, "I have as much right