86

58

be true for other minds.
Much of what they say is unquestionably false of many races of mankind.
But I, for my point, take little stock in a logic that is not voalid for all minds, in asmuch as the logicality of a given argument, as I have said, does not depend on how we think that argument, but upon what the truth is.
Other logicians endeavoring to steer clear of psychology, as far as possible, think that this first branch of logic must relate to the possibility of knowledge of the real world and upon the sense in which it is true that the real world can be known.
This branch of philosophy, called epistemology, or