38

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions
jasirs94 at Nov 29, 2016 03:17 AM

38

The Second Division of Cenoscopy, or
Deuteroscopy, has two parts is distinguished must, I think, break away from Phaneroscopy
in distinguishing between what is as a fact and
what apparently might be, but isn't. It thus strikes
its dominant note of Duality on its first Inception.
In accordance harmony with this duality of in its substance, it is I think
divides it should divide into two Problems, Ontology, which recognizes
two kinds of Existent, Mind and Matter, and
Normative Science. which which recognizes
the bad as distinct from the good

But remembering that we are in the region of cenoscopy,
the idea of ethics is too narrow. How can there
be a science of ethics before psychology is understood?
As a cenoscopic science, I think it must be broader
and include the existent generally. Moreover, I do not
see how there can be any rational approval or disapproval of a
mere idea in itself and therefore I think there can be no
esthetics until something is to be done with the idea.
Esthetics, therefore, can be nothing but a branch of ethics. But

38