Pages 44 & 45 - V. A Study of Adjacent Sites
Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.
4 revisions | MKMcCabe at Oct 26, 2022 03:17 PM | |
---|---|---|
Pages 44 & 45 - V. A Study of Adjacent Sites44 U.C.D. and the Future could be subject to the approval of the Government, or exercised by it on V. A STUDY OF ADJACENT SITES A. THE COMMISSION'S REJECTION OF ADJACENT SITES "We began with our work,' writes the Commission (Report, Chapter I, Every circumstance indicated to us that that was the proper course In short, the Commission was convinced that a move is undesirable and The Commission gave 'lengthy consideration' to two blocks of property The Commission made no mention whatsoever of the block marked 'B2,' *Our map covers the same area and carries the same letters to denote the blocks A Study of Adjacent Sites 45 intended to close the line, and indeed the closure was carried out and the Having considered blocks B1 and D the Commission writes (Report, p. 31): 'We came to the conclusion, however, after considerable discussion Presumably, if these blocks could be acquired within a reasonable period, B. A RECONSIDERATION OF THESE AND OTHER ADJACENT SITES Block B1 We agree that at the moment the acquisition of block B1 would be difficult. Block D and Adjacent Areas South of Adelaide Road to the Canal The C.I.E. property in this area, hitherto occupied by railway lines as Without at present acquiring the houses along Adelaide Road or the houses (a) 'The Lawn' (recently purchased by the Dental Hospital). | Pages 44 & 45 - V. A Study of Adjacent Sites[left page] 44 [Heading[ U.C.D. and the Future could be subject to the approval of the Government, or exercised by it on [heading] V. A STUDY OF ADJACENT SITES [sub-heading] A. THE COMMISSION'S REJECTION OF ADJACENT SITES "We began with our work,' writes the Commission (Report, Chapter I, Every circumstance indicated to us that that was the proper course In short, the Commission was convinced that a move is undesirable and The Commission gave 'lengthy consideration' to two blocks of property The Commission made no mention whatsoever of the block marked 'B2,' [line] *Our map covers the same area and carries the same letters to denote the blocks [end left page] [begin right page] [heading] A Study of Adjacent Sites pg 45 intended to close the line, and indeed the closure was carried out and the Having considered blocks B1 and D the Commission writes (Report, p. 31): 'We came to the conclusion, however, after considerable discussion Presumably, if these blocks could be acquired within a reasonable period, [heading] B. A RECONSIDERATION OF THESE AND OTHER ADJACENT SITES Block B1 We agree that at the moment the acquisition of block B1 would be difficult. [sub-heading] Block D and Adjacent Areas South of Adelaide Road to the Canal The C.I.E. property in this area, hitherto occupied by railway lines as Without at present acquiring the houses along Adelaide Road or the houses (a) 'The Lawn' (recently purchased by the Dental Hospital). |