MS 145

ReadAboutContentsHelp
19x, 20 ... 32, 31

Pages

19x
Complete

19x

TOPICS

PART I. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS

Chapter 1. Logic

I do not think that there is any one ultimate analysis of logical relations which, from a purely logical standpoint, excluding all psychological considerations, can be said to be the true analysis to the exclusion of all others. I think, on the contrary, as in mathematiucs an imaginary quantity may equally be defined by its modulus and argument, as [EEK!]

Last edit about 8 years ago by greatcathy
20
Complete

20

an analysis as any, and is the only satisfactory analysis that I have seen, except one substantially the same given by myself. In existential graphs, we have the following signs:

Last edit over 7 years ago by jeffdown1
21
Complete

21

Normal text

Last edit almost 8 years ago by jeffdown1
22
Complete

22

Fig 7 asserts that there are more than one man. Fig. 8 asserts that everything is identical with itself. Fig. 9 asserts that everything is identical with something and is other than something.

The system as thus far developed is called the Beta development, the Alpha development being the system without the lines of identity. A Gamma is required. For example, Fig. 8 does not express the principle of identity since it merely asserts, as a fact, that anything is identical with itself. The Beta development is limited to the expression of propositions de inesse.

In order to represent the reasoning of mathematics in all its fullness, two improvements must be made. In the first place the operation of hypostatic abstraction must be rendered practicable. This has been the object of jeers since Molière died in enacting the recipiendaire in the 8th Intermède of the

Last edit over 7 years ago by jasirs94
23
Complete

23

Malade Imaginaire

(unclear) Miki an docto doctore Domandatus candam et rationem quare Opium facit dormiro, A quoi resondeo Quia est in (unclear) (unclear) est natura (unclear) assoupire

CHORUS

Bene, bene, bene, bene respondere, Dignus, dignus est intrare In nostro dueto corpore Bene, bene respondere.

Nevertheless, this operation of clipping the wings of words, as it maybe called, if definite terms are called [??] and indefinite [??]. 'Solomon is [?]. Here 'Solomon' is definite in its denotation, 'wise is indefinite, for it is a wise man, some wise man, not in itself specifying which among wise men. But change it to 'Solomon is a posession of wisdom,' and though possessor is in itself vague, both as to its subject nominative and its genitive, got wisdom is the name of a single

Last edit over 3 years ago by logiebear
Displaying pages 1 - 5 of 15 in total