10

We shall see, in due time, [where?] these five premises are. Suffice is for the [present?] to say there are only five. Now if each of them could be efficient and that in only on way, as one would have a night to infer from the account of reasoning given in the [leach?] books it would neccesarily fathom that these could no be [but 3q?] theorums of the theory of members in all; whereas of highly in [leadership?] themselves already beknown there are hundreds. [Eurlids?] Elements, which was never designed to be more than an introduction to geometry and algebra (or that theory with which the [necks?] served the purpose of our algebra) has only 5 [potentials?] which one [theorum?] [presides?] together.