Page 1

Topics for the Board

I. Reasons why the case of the Judges is not parallel

II. Peculiar [never?] of expense at Universy
1. Hospitalities to students & their friends
2. Do {Ditto} to strangers

Effect of both to conciliate good-will,- obtain in-
fluence,-control tumults, - anticipate judgment of public
in times of difficulty & riot

3. Attentions in likeness to students
4. Applications for subscriptions.

III. Answer to objection that revenues will be absorbed
in perpetual extension.

Instruction at the U, is it [real ?]. [?]
[?] as hitherto, without enlargement. Private enter
prise will apply accommodation. But defect in
instruction, by dimin'd effort, or impaired zeal, or di-
verted attention will occasion vast [enquiry & ultimately
irremediable [view?]

IV. Answer to objection that must await action of [?],
whether that action be favourable or other-
wise, how cd a diversion of funds take place without
enquiring authorities of U to charge of disingenuous
[oneness?] with Legislature? Will it not be said
you {wanted} got an approp'n upon false pretences
(or applied for it). As is [found?]) by [afterwards?] expending
money which was equally called for, if at all, be-
fore?

V. [Sch?] [of tax?]
be at on first $1000 of [?]