3

{right} claim to his info's Chattels in possession, and his title by
the courtesy. The English author' which seem adverse to this last
propositions are not applicable. (2 Bl. Cem. 130; 1 Th-Co-Lit Bog_, because
they refer exclusively to cases where the marre is annulled
ab initio, for a cause [sub?] when it was contracted, there being at Com. Law no [?] cause whatsoever
for [who?] a marre might be dissolved. [1 Bl?]. [C?]. 441: [b?]. [Alr?]. Marrege
(p). 3/

But I do not deem it necessary to elaborate this point,
deeming it to be practically certain that L's estate is to deemed
separate one.