195

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Complete

why should it be unthinkable that he should consider the pleasure of others, or their well being, or the beauty of the result, or anything else, in forming his determination as well as his own pleasure?
Do not men make testamentary dispositions?
The absurdity of maintaining that it is unthinkable that a man should consider anything but his own pleasure, drives is to the conclusion that those who use this argument us the word pleasute in the sense of satisfaction.
Because it certainly is unthinkable that a sufficiently considered act is one that accords with the man's previous intentions and satisfaction is precisedly the perception of that accordance.
Only, if this were what they meant that an act

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page