6

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Needs Review

Logic IV. 17 footnote continued
adequare definitions should be acknowledged as terms of philosophy with those definitions. But terms substantially superfluous are not to be acknowledged.

Rule III. To use as a term in philosophy in one sens as expression which is a term of philosophy in a conflicting sense should be stigmatized as wrong doings. In order formally to convey a meaning which belongs to a term of philosophy it will be best to use that term.

Rule IV. When a conception of philosoply is generalized a philosophical term signifying it and consisting of a single work may be corresponding generalized a limiting word being provided to mark the old conception. But this proceeding is only justifies in case it is conducive to the advance of philosophy.
Rule V. A system of terms marking the relations of a system of old conceptions is not superfluous in case no ther such system exists

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page